Golden ratio base
This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (August 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Numeral systems |
---|
Hindu–Arabic numeral system |
East Asian |
Alphabetic |
Former |
Positional systems by base |
Non-standard positional numeral systems |
List of numeral systems |
Golden ratio base is a non-integer positional numeral system that uses the golden ratio (the irrational number 1 + √5/2 ≈ 1.61803399 symbolized by the Greek letter φ) as its base. It is sometimes referred to as base-φ, golden mean base, phi-base, or, colloquially, phinary. Any non-negative real number can be represented as a base-φ numeral using only the digits 0 and 1, and avoiding the digit sequence "11" – this is called a standard form. A base-φ numeral that includes the digit sequence "11" can always be rewritten in standard form, using the algebraic properties of the base φ — most notably that φ + 1 = φ^{2}. For instance, 11_{φ} = 100_{φ}.
Despite using an irrational number base, when using standard form, all non-negative integers have a unique representation as a terminating (finite) base-φ expansion. The set of numbers which possess a finite base-φ representation is the ring Z[1 + √5/2]; it plays the same role in this numeral systems as dyadic rationals play in binary numbers, providing a possibility to multiply.
Other numbers have standard representations in base-φ, with rational numbers having recurring representations. These representations are unique, except that numbers (mentioned above) with a terminating expansion also have a non-terminating expansion, as they do in base-10; for example, 1 = 0.99999….
Contents
- 1 Examples
- 2 Writing golden ratio base numbers in standard form
- 3 Representing integers as golden ratio base numbers
- 4 Representing rational numbers as golden ratio base numbers
- 5 Representing irrational numbers of note as golden ratio base numbers
- 6 Addition, subtraction, and multiplication
- 7 Division
- 8 Relationship with Fibonacci coding
- 9 Practical usage
- 10 See also
- 11 Notes
- 12 References
- 13 External links
Examples[edit]
Decimal | Powers of φ | Base φ |
---|---|---|
1 | φ^{0} | 1 |
2 | φ^{1} + φ^{−2} | 10.01 |
3 | φ^{2} + φ^{−2} | 100.01 |
4 | φ^{2} + φ^{0} + φ^{−2} | 101.01 |
5 | φ^{3} + φ^{−1} + φ^{−4} | 1000.1001 |
6 | φ^{3} + φ^{1} + φ^{−4} | 1010.0001 |
7 | φ^{4} + φ^{−4} | 10000.0001 |
8 | φ^{4} + φ^{0} + φ^{−4} | 10001.0001 |
9 | φ^{4} + φ^{1} + φ^{−2} + φ^{−4} | 10010.0101 |
10 | φ^{4} + φ^{2} + φ^{−2} + φ^{−4} | 10100.0101 |
Writing golden ratio base numbers in standard form[edit]
In the following example the notation 1 is used to represent −1.
211.01_{φ} is not a standard base-φ numeral, since it contains a "11" and a "2", which isn't a "0" or "1", and contains a 1 = −1, which isn't a "0" or "1" either.
To "standardize" a numeral, we can use the following substitutions: 011_{φ} = 100_{φ}, 0200_{φ} = 1001_{φ}, 010_{φ} = 101_{φ} and 110_{φ} = 001_{φ}. We can apply the substitutions in any order we like, as the result is the same. Below, the substitutions applied to the number on the previous line are on the right, the resulting number on the left.
211.01_{φ} | |
300.01_{φ} | 011_{φ} → 100_{φ} |
1101.01_{φ} | 0200_{φ} → 1001_{φ} |
10001.01_{φ} | 011_{φ} → 100_{φ} (again) |
10001.101_{φ} | 010_{φ} → 101_{φ} |
10000.011_{φ} | 110_{φ} → 001_{φ} |
10000.1_{φ} | 011_{φ} → 100_{φ} (again) |
Any positive number with a non-standard terminating base-φ representation can be uniquely standardized in this manner. If we get to a point where all digits are "0" or "1", except for the first digit being negative, then the number is negative. (The exception to this is when the first digit is negative one and the next two digits are one, like 1111.001=1.001.) This can be converted to the negative of a base-φ representation by negating every digit, standardizing the result, and then marking it as negative. For example, use a minus sign, or some other significance to denote negative numbers. If the arithmetic is being performed on a computer, an error message may be returned.
Representing integers as golden ratio base numbers[edit]
We can either consider our integer to be the (only) digit of a nonstandard base-φ numeral, and standardize it, or do the following:
1 × 1 = 1, φ × φ = 1 + φ and 1/φ = −1 + φ. Therefore, we can compute
- (a + bφ) + (c + dφ) = ((a + c) + (b + d)φ),
- (a + bφ) − (c + dφ) = ((a − c) + (b − d)φ)
and
- (a + bφ) × (c + dφ) = ((ac + bd) + (ad + bc + bd)φ).
So, using integer values only, we can add, subtract and multiply numbers of the form (a + bφ), and even represent positive and negative integer powers of φ.
(a + bφ) > (c + dφ) if and only if 2(a − c) − (d − b) > (d − b) × √5. If one side is negative, the other positive, the comparison is trivial. Otherwise, square both sides, to get an integer comparison, reversing the comparison direction if both sides were negative. On squaring both sides, the √5 is replaced with the integer 5.
So, using integer values only, we can also compare numbers of the form (a + bφ).
- To convert an integer x to a base-φ number, note that x = (x + 0φ).
- Subtract the highest power of φ, which is still smaller than the number we have, to get our new number, and record a "1" in the appropriate place in the resulting base-φ number.
- Unless our number is 0, go to step 2.
- Finished.
The above procedure will never result in the sequence "11", since 11_{φ} = 100_{φ}, so getting a "11" would mean we missed a "1" prior to the sequence "11".
Start, e.g., with integer = 5, with the result so far being ...00000.00000..._{φ}
Highest power of φ ≤ 5 is φ^{3} = 1 + 2φ ≈ 4.236067977
Subtracting this from 5, we have 5 − (1 + 2φ) = 4 − 2φ ≈ 0.763932023..., the result so far being 1000.00000..._{φ}
Highest power of φ ≤ 4 − 2φ ≈ 0.763932023... is φ^{−1} = −1 + 1φ ≈ 0.618033989...
Subtracting this from 4 − 2φ ≈ 0.763932023..., we have 4 − 2φ − (−1 + 1φ) = 5 − 3φ ≈ 0.145898034..., the result so far being 1000.10000..._{φ}
Highest power of φ ≤ 5 − 3φ ≈ 0.145898034... is φ^{−4} = 5 − 3φ ≈ 0.145898034...
Subtracting this from 5 − 3φ ≈ 0.145898034..., we have 5 − 3φ − (5 − 3φ) = 0 + 0φ = 0, with the final result being 1000.1001_{φ}.
Non-uniqueness[edit]
Just as with any base-n system, numbers with a terminating representation have an alternative recurring representation. In base-10, this relies on the observation that 0.999...=1. In base-φ, the numeral 0.1010101... can be seen to be equal to 1 in several ways:
- Conversion to nonstandard form: 1 = 0.11_{φ} = 0.1011_{φ} = 0.101011_{φ} = ... = 0.10101010...._{φ}
- Geometric series: 1.0101010..._{φ} is equal to
- Difference between "shifts": φ^{2} x − x = 10.101010..._{φ} − 0.101010..._{φ} = 10_{φ} = φ so that x = φ/φ^{2} − 1 = 1
This non-uniqueness is a feature of the numeration system, since both 1.0000 and 0.101010... are in standard form.
In general, the final 1 of any number in base-φ can be replaced with a recurring 01 without changing the value of that number.
Representing rational numbers as golden ratio base numbers[edit]
Every non-negative rational number can be represented as a recurring base-φ expansion, as can any non-negative element of the field Q[√5] = Q + √5Q, the field generated by the rational numbers and √5. Conversely any recurring (or terminating) base-φ expansion is a non-negative element of Q[√5]. For recurring decimals, the recurring part has been overlined:
- 1/2 ≈ 0.010_{φ}
- 1/3 ≈ 0.00101000_{φ}
- √5 = 10.1_{φ}
- 2 + √5/13 ≈ 10.010100010001010100010001000000_{φ}
The justification that a rational gives a recurring expansion is analogous to the equivalent proof for a base-n numeration system (n = 2,3,4,...). Essentially in base-φ long division there are only a finite number of possible remainders, and so once there must be a recurring pattern. For example, with 1/2 = 1/10.01_{φ} = 100_{φ}/1001_{φ} long division looks like this (note that base-φ subtraction may be hard to follow at first):
.0 1 0 0 1
________________________
1 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 trade: 10000 = 1100 = 1011
------- so 10000 − 1001 = 1011 − 1001 = 10
1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1
-------
etc.
The converse is also true, in that a number with a recurring base-φ; representation is an element of the field Q[√5]. This follows from the observation that a recurring representation with period k involves a geometric series with ratio φ^{−k}, which will sum to an element of Q[√5].
Representing irrational numbers of note as golden ratio base numbers[edit]
The base-φ representations of some interesting numbers:
- π ≈ 100.0100 1010 1001 0001 0101 0100 0001 0100 ..._{φ} (sequence A102243 in the OEIS)
- e ≈ 100.0000 1000 0100 1000 0000 0100 ..._{φ} (sequence A105165 in the OEIS)
- √2 ≈ 1.0100 0001 0100 1010 0100 0000 0101 0000 0000 0101 ..._{φ}
- φ = 1+√5/2 = 10_{φ}
- √5 = 10.1_{φ}
Addition, subtraction, and multiplication[edit]
It is possible to adapt all the standard algorithms of base-10 arithmetic to base-φ arithmetic. There are two approaches to this:
Calculate, then convert to standard form[edit]
For addition of two base-φ numbers, add each pair of digits, without carry, and then convert the numeral to standard form. For subtraction, subtract each pair of digits without borrow (borrow is a negative amount of carry), and then convert the numeral to standard form. For multiplication, multiply in the typical base-10 manner, without carry, then convert the numeral to standard form.
For example,
- 2 + 3 = 10.01 + 100.01 = 110.02 = 110.1001 = 1000.1001
- 2 × 3 = 10.01 × 100.01 = 1000.1 + 1.0001 = 1001.1001 = 1010.0001
- 7 − 2 = 10000.0001 − 10.01 = 10010.0101 = 1110.0101 = 1001.0101 = 1000.1001
Avoid digits other than 0 and 1[edit]
A more "native" approach is to avoid having to add digits 1+1 or to subtract 0 – 1. This is done by reorganising the operands into nonstandard form so that these combinations do not occur. For example,
- 2 + 3 = 10.01 + 100.01 = 10.01 + 100.0011 = 110.0111 = 1000.1001
- 7 − 2 = 10000.0001 − 10.01 = 1100.0001 − 10.01 = 1011.0001 − 10.01 = 1010.1101 − 10.01 = 1000.1001
The subtraction seen here uses a modified form of the standard "trading" algorithm for subtraction.
Division[edit]
No non-integer rational number can be represented as a finite base-φ number. In other words, all finitely representable base-φ numbers are either integers or (more likely) an irrational in a quadratic field Q[√5]. Due to long division having only a finite number of possible remainders, a division of two integers (or other numbers with finite base-φ representation) will have a recurring expansion, as demonstrated above.
Relationship with Fibonacci coding[edit]
Fibonacci coding is a closely related numeration system used for integers. In this system, only digits 0 and 1 are used and the place values of the digits are the Fibonacci numbers. As with base-φ, the digit sequence "11" is avoided by rearranging to a standard form, using the Fibonacci recurrence relation F_{k+1} = F_{k} + F_{k−1}. For example,
- 30 = 1×21 + 0×13 + 1×8 + 0×5 + 0×3 + 0×2 + 1×1 + 0×1 = 10100010_{fib}.
Practical usage[edit]
It is possible to mix base-φ arithmetic with Fibonacci integer sequences. The sum of numbers in a General Fibonacci integer sequence that correspond with the nonzero digits in the base-φ number, is the multiplication of the base-φ number and the element at the zero-position in the sequence. For example:
- product 10 (10100.0101 base-φ) and 25 (zero position) = 5 + 10 + 65 + 170 = 250
- base-φ: 1 0 1 0 0. 0 1 0 1
- partial sequence: ... 5 5 10 15 25 40 65 105 170 275 445 720 1165 ...
- product 10 (10100.0101 base-φ) and 65 (zero position) = 10 + 25 + 170 + 445 = 650
- base-φ: 1 0 1 0 0. 0 1 0 1
- partial sequence: ... 5 5 10 15 25 40 65 105 170 275 445 720 1165 ...
See also[edit]
- Beta encoder – Originally used golden ratio base
- Ostrowski numeration
Notes[edit]
References[edit]
- Bergman, George (1957). "A Number System with an Irrational Base". Mathematics Magazine. 31 (2): 98–110. doi:10.2307/3029218. JSTOR 3029218.
- Eggan, L. C.; vanden Eynden, C. L. (1966). "Decimal expansions to nonintegral bases". Amer. Math. Monthly (73): 576–582. JSTOR 2314786.
- Plojhar, Jozef (1971). "The Good natured Rabbit breeder". Manifold. 11: 26–30.
External links[edit]